|
|
(Your shopping cart is empty)
| |
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
|
Awesome! |
May 14, 2012 |
| Reviewer:
David Lopez
from Somerville, MA United States
|
|
Fits Perfectly on my large noggin, had purchased the m42 and it was a tad small, superb customer service.
Was this review helpful to you? 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Reproduction Helmet |
April 25, 2012 |
| Reviewer:
Chuck
from Kailua Kona, HI United States
|
|
It's dark green and It's a nice piece of equipment. Very nice. Better than the real thing.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Exceeded expectations |
April 12, 2012 |
| Reviewer:
Rick der Ziegelstein
from Surrey, BC Canada
|
|
Absolutely awesome! Super satisfied and will be continuing to purchase from you guys for a very long time!
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(WH) Helmet, "M-1935" |
April 11, 2012 |
| Reviewer:
Curt Reus
from Colorado Springs, CO United States
|
|
- For the cost (under $100) - a good value
- Not "$125 quality", but reasonably well made with a nice liner, & C/S. (though would not be mistaken for an original)
- Also a greater value, when considering the cost of an adult human sized Original shell with the added expense of re-lining it.
- Some minor forming flaws to the (mild steel) shell (not an issue for me, as I've using this Helmet under a Camo Cover.
- The dark green shade paint appears to be more in line w/ that used mid/ late-war (esp. the "M-42" & later "M-35" re-works) As the exteriors were frequently painted in service/ combat use, the buyer can simply re-paint in the "correct" shade of their preference.
- Sturdy/ structurally well made, & will holdup up well under normal use/ wear. (aside from be used as a T-34 speed bump)
- O/A recommended (even at non-Sale price - these are more of "bargain") ,esp. with the good general quality/ detail.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
poor liner & split pins |
March 24, 2012 |
| Reviewer:
Dominic Cairo
from Addison, IL United States
|
|
while the shell was fantastic, the liner was advertised as a 60, in reality it was a 65. i was very disapointed. the split pins were not steel, but some cheap yellow metal. they are holding up poorly and my not hold the liner i put into it.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
